Field Sobriety Tests: Attorney Sloan Believes That a Refusal Is Better Than a Failure

Basically, because you refused to do it you probably would have failed. I believe a refusal is still much better than actually doing the test and them pointing out all of the things that you did wrong. Than supposedly having proof that you were impaired because you could not do the test in the first place.

Interviewer: That is actually what I was going to ask you, if you would recommend doing them as opposed to not doing them. You would still recommend not performing the field sobriety tests.

If You Refuse, You Can Justify Your Decision during Your Trial

Brian: Yes, absolutely. I think you respectfully decline to do them and you can always testify about your decision at the trial because the prosecutor will try to make the point that you refused because you were impaired.

The client can take the stand and say” I didn’t do the test because I have balance issues and I didn’t want to give the officer the wrong impression that I was impaired.”

Interviewer: I know you can’t give specifics, but how often is this defense successful? Is it usually a pretty solid defense?

Brian: I think it is always better for the person to refuse the field sobriety test. The officer is always going to say that the person failed the field sobriety test even if they do perform it very well.

Declining the Field Sobriety Tests Is a Defensible Issue during Trial

The officer is always going to chalk it up that a failure was due to alcohol impairment, or drug or medication impairment. Our argument is always going to be that generally people don’t have good balance. They don’t naturally have good balance.

Your Defense Attorney Will Point out the Difficulty That Any Person Would Experience in Correctly Performing the Field Sobriety Tests

I will often tell the jury that, basically, the field sobriety test should be ignored because the only people that can really do it are ballerinas, gymnasts, and police officers because they practice so much.

It is not uncommon for either the prosecutor or I to ask the officer to demonstrate these field sobriety tests. Even in open court the officer can’t successfully do the field sobriety tests. They try to explain that they need to keep their foot up for 30 seconds.

You will see the officer tap his foot down on the ground just as any normal person would do. And then this question naturally follows, “Officer, are you impaired by alcohol?”

Interviewer: Have you said that during a trial?

The Defense Attorney Will Try to Instill Reasonable Doubt in the Minds of the Jurors

Brian: I haven’t gone that far. But I’ve tried to explain to the jury. The defense attorney is not really allowed to interact with the jury. I can’t really directly instruct them about something, that is the judge’s responsibility.

What I can do is try to put an idea into their minds as much as possible. In this instance, the idea I try to instill is that if these jurors had gone back and attempted to do these field sobriety tests being a hundred percent sober, they would not be able to do them.

I may have asked an officer once or twice if they were drunk.

Interviewer: We covered horizontal gaze Nystagmus and the walking turn tests. Are there other standard field sobriety tests that people will encounter during a police stop?

The One Leg Stand Test

Brian: Yes. One of the other tests is the one leg stand. This is where basically the officers are looking to see if the person sways while balancing, if they use their arms for balance by raising them six inches or more from their side and to see if they’re hopping during the test.

What Are the Police Officers Looking For During the Administration of this Test?

The officer will look to see if they put their foot down or to see if they simply cannot do the test because they put their foot down three or more times. Many people can’t keep their foot up that long. It doesn’t matter if they’re sober, drunk, old, young, people cannot do this for a sustained period of time.

The officers are trying to attribute it to alcohol. They’ll see if you put your foot down even temporarily. They are watching if you count incorrectly, if you count for too long, if you stop the test, and if you raise your arms more than six inches from your side.

They really don’t tell you that any of these actions are going to be used as strikes against you. But that’s what they’re looking for. That’s what they’re marking you down as doing. Inevitably, just about everyone fails these tests.

By Brian Douglas Sloan

Call me today for an
‘In Depth’ Free Consultation

Brian Douglas Sloan


Why Attorney Brian Douglas Sloan?
Phoenix DUI Lawyer

Why Attorney Brian Douglas Sloan?


18+ Years SOLELY Focused on DUI Defense


4,100+ DUIs Successfully Defended

Top Accolades

  • Only DUI "Power Lawyer" in the Nation Featured in USA Today, 2022

  • Top 10 in Arizona

Top 1%

Top One Percent in the Nation

Superb 10/10

4.9 / 5.0


“I am one of only a handful of Phoenix DUI Lawyers that focuses solely on DUI Defense representation.”

I have spent my entire career focused on DUI Defense representation, having personally defended more than 4,100+ DUI clients in the past 18+ years.

If you’re looking for a divorce attorney, tax attorney, or civil attorney, then I can comfortably say: "I’m not the one for you".

Coming up with traditional, as well as outside-the-box motions and defenses for my clients, often with good results, is the hallmark of my practice.

Lawyers that say they are "aggressive", or "will fight for you", are a dime a dozen. They use these phrases because that is what they think people want to hear. The truth of the matter is, being "aggressive" rarely gets the client anywhere in these court systems. Being "aggressive" isn’t the same as being good, and is often used to put on a show for a client to hide the fact that they aren’t doing anything meaningful for the client.

The same is true for the lawyers that claim to do DUI Defense... and Criminal Cases..., and Accident cases..., and Divorces. A Jack-of-all-Trades is a master of none. By handling all different sorts of cases, they take away from their ability to truly focus on DUIs, and keep up to date on the latest changes in DUI Defense Representation.

What I offer is intelligent, quality DUI Defense, at an exceptional price.

I am one of only a handful of Arizona DUI Lawyers that focuses solely on DUI Defense representation.

I have not only taught other lawyers how to do DUI Defense Representation at statewide seminars, but I produce DUI Legal Guides used by defense lawyers across Arizona.

I am one of the most award-winning DUI Defense Lawyers in Arizona; have been recognized nationally, including in a 2022 issue of USA Today; and there are only a few lawyers in Arizona who have personally defended more DUI cases than I have. I am also one of the most reasonably-priced DUI Lawyers, as I pride myself on charging a Flat Rate only for the legal services you need, and not for the legal services you don’t.

I am also the lawyer who people call once they realize that their original lawyer screwed something up, gave them false hope or false promises, or simply just took their money and didn’t do much on the case. You would be surprised at how often this happens.

Save yourself the trouble of hiring the wrong lawyer, and hire the right DUI Defense Lawyer from the start.

You can reach me on my personal cell phone: 480-720-7839.

Let me know if you have any questions!

Brian Douglas Sloan

DUI Attorney

Free Initial

Email address:
2 N. Central Ave Suite 1929
Phoenix, AZ 85004